`
Mr. Picker reported that he had received a letter from the Board of Selectmen with details and dates pertaining to the State of the Town meeting.
Ms. Romano, speaking on behalf of herself and Karena Hansen, offered a summary of the arrangements, fees and tour options, as well as details regarding supervision.
Ms. Dobrow expressed concern about the high cost at a time when the School Committee has attempted to reduce fees and inquired about whether there would be any provision for financial assistance. Ms. Nyquist added that, given the lack of financial assistance and the contractual obligation to compensate teachers for such trips, she would be uncomfortable with School Committee sponsorship.
There was additional discussion about concerns if both campuses did not have this opportunity and whether the district wishes to permit Ms. Romano and Ms. Hansen to proceed with arrangements but without School Committee sponsorship.
Discussion continued among School Committee members and audience members about alternatives to School Committee sponsorship. It was observed that the trip, as described, would present several issues that would require waiving the district�s policy regarding overnight field trips.
Mr. Peery moved that the Committee accept the LSF grants for these three projects. Mr. Picker seconded the motion. Mr. Picker also expressed appreciation to the Lincoln School Foundation for their continued support. The Committee voted unanimously to accept the motion.
The School Committee expressed its interest in hearing the report and listening to public comments about it. The Committee will not be defining specific next steps at this meeting.
Mr. Brandmeyer welcomed the task force comprised of ten parents and teachers who looked at the data from the Middle School survey of spring 2003. The task force analyzed the data and formulated key questions related to the themes. He anticipated that another committee would be formed to take this work to the next steps.
Judy Glassman introduced the task force members and offered a summary of how the task force conducted its work over a seven week period. Generally, speaking, they worked in dyads to look at different sections of data, brought those impressions back to the general group for discussion, and then dyads met again to formulate the key questions.
Each pair then reported on their area of focus and explained the key questions that emerged from their analysis.
As the report continued there were several questions about the meaning of the survey data and concerns that some types of responses were not disaggregated.
Mr. Brandmeyer reminded everyone that the task was not to do a statistical analysis, but to discern the tone of comments and interpret what people were saying in their survey responses.
Ms. Dobrow thanked the task force and commended them for effectively condensing the data and for asking good questions. She observed that she noticed in the data a sense among parents that they do not feel welcome in the school but she does not see the depth of that feeling about this particular point in the task force comments and questions.
Mr. Peery thanked everyone for their tremendous effort. He said that he knew many positive actions have already been generated. His reading of the data suggests a need to set higher standards and strive to have 80% of survey responses in the positive category. He also concluded from data in the section pertaining to �Curriculum and Instruction� that more exploration is needed about Health, school culture, Science instruction, celebration of achievement, and differentiation of instruction.
Laurie Manos suggested that in the next phase closer attention be given to survey responses that show a lack of student interest in assignments. Eighth grade teacher Julie Reynolds expressed a hope that in the next step of the process it will be possible to bring more teacher data into the discussion. Ann Rothenberg observed that at this time of transition there is a good opportunity to improve communication and get more people involved.
Discussion continued among the School Committee, the task force and the audience about what are regarded as the key messages of the report and how these questions fit with goals that are already being expressed. There was also concern about announcing as soon as possible what the next steps will be so that the public sees these issues as being �front and center.�
Mr. Picker assured the audience in the fall there will be attention to this issue at early School Committee meetings, where a work plan to address the district goal relating to middle school improvement will be presented and discussed by the school administration.
Discussion continued with further consideration about the applicability of the task force�s questions to the Hanscom Middle School, the composition of the next work group, and the appropriateness of distributing the raw data. On this last point about data Mr. Brandmeyer urged that the data be available only in aggregate form so that it is helpful without being hurtful. Ms. Hessler urged that data summaries get created soon and made available soon.
Mr. Picker moved that the Committee adopt the district goals with the understanding that a goal about leadership for Lincoln School would be included. Ms. Nyquist seconded the motion. The Committee unanimously approved the motion.
After discussion the Committee decided that another draft was needed, and agreed that Ms. Dobrow and Mr. Peery will work together before the next meeting to revise the document. The Committee will attempt to complete is self evaluation at the July 7 meeting.
Mr. Picker moved that the Committee accept 2004-2005 goals. Ms. Nyquist seconded the motion. The committee unanimously approved the motion.
He reported that the Finance Committee is receptive to the idea of a reserve fund transfer for the facilities study.
There was brief discussion about other end of year expenses and purchases.
Mr. Jack reported that information from NSTAR suggests that it is wise to proceed with energy efficiency and lighting improvement projects at the Hanscom campus. He suggested doing the Hanscom Middle School first and that it is possible to have all of the HMS lighting replaced by August 1st. He has learned that the new fixtures will definitely improve light quality in the HMS cafeteria and kitchen. The School Committee agreed with this recommendation, and asked that the work procede.
The Committee adjourned to executive session at 10:41 p.m.
Respectfully submitted by
Paul Naso, Assistant Superintendent