Oversight of District Operations Work Plan
Prepared by Dennis Picker
9/20/04
- Results to be achieved
- Ensure that District is managed in a systematic way that delivers expected outcomes in a timely way
- Timely review of key aspects of District operations
- Remediation or re-evaluation of targets when targets are missed
- Evaluate Superintendent against objective criteria
- Relationship to other SC or District goals
- School Committee oversight of teaching, learning, curriculum development and professional development
(this goal also addresses aspects of managing District by goals)
- Milestone events and dates
- Transportation review: revenue, schedule, satisfaction: 9/16/04
- After-school Athletics review: revenue, enrollment, costs, financial aid: 10/14/04
- LASMP review: revenue, enrollment, costs, financial aid: 10/14/04
- SPED projections for program participation and services vs. actuals: 11/18/04
- Spending reviews:
10/14/04
12/16/04(to coincide with voting the FY06 budget)
3/10/04
5/25/05
6/23/05
- Town Meeting Warrant item (capital and expense) status reviews:
9/16/04
12/16/04(to coincide with voting the FY06 budget)
3/10/05
- Status report on leadership structure at Lincoln school:
11/18/04, or 12/2/04 or 12/16/04
- District enrollment update:
7/7/04
9/16/04
12/16/04 (to coincide with voting the FY06 budget)
6/8/05
- Review Hanscom facilities plan: 10/14/04
- Evaluate performance of Superintendent:
1/27/05- distribute materials to SC members
3/10/05- discuss and adopt evaluation
- Review workplans for achieving district goals:
Review district workplans:
Strategic plan, SPED evaluation, Technology plan- 9/30/04
Middle school improvement- 10/28/04
Review school improvement plans:
Hanscom primary and middle- 10/14/04
Lincoln-10/28/04
Receive full set of district workplans, schedule future discussion as needed: 10/14/04
- Evaluate progress of district workplans
Mid year review- 1/27/05
End year review- 5/25/05
- Adopt FY06 district goals
Initial discussion: 5/12/05
Second discussion: 5/26/05
Adopt: 6/8/05
- People and resources involved
- School Committee members
- Central office and school administrative teams
- No subcommittees directly involved in this workplan
- Assessment criteria
- Ensure that District is managed in a systematic way
- Were the workplans for district goals reviewed as scheduled?
- Were the mid-year and end-year status review of goals conducted as planned?
- Were the goals for FY06 discussed and adopted as planned?
- Timely review of key aspects of District operations
- Did the various milestone reviews described in this plan occur as scheduled and with appropriate content?
- Were corrective actions taken?
- Evaluate Superintendent against established criteria
- Was a written evaluation presented at a public meeting, and was it objective, and did it follow criteria established in advance?